Textual poaching goes beyond uses surrounding the politics of fandom: It is utilized to advance social positions concerning gender, race, social class and politics. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture by Jenkins: Used. ![]() He even goes as far as to break this madness down into the masculine and feminine sides of fandom. Supplementing the original, classic text is an interview between Henry Jenkins and Suzanne Scott in which. Taste is brought up, as it is mentioned that fans tend to try justifying their own pleasures as being normal or tasteful by comparing themselves to others who are even more extreme or ridiculous. Fans can also be textual poachers, meaning that they take bits and pieces from the media that they follow, and apply them to their own lives. Textual poachers television fans & participatory culture Henry Jenkins. Jenkins argues that “fans are not unique in their status as textual poachers, yet, they have developed poaching into an art form” (27). Published New York London: Routledge, 1992. He goes on to describe the conflicts between fans and producers and how the producers are more interested in what makes money, instead of what makes the fans happy. On the topic of textual poachers, Jenkins asserts that fans are not only consumers of the media, but they also manufacture their own creations out of the text that they have poached. They also communicate with one another in a way that makes this poaching a culture in of itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |